Lenovo Flex 14 Inch 2 in 1 10th Gen Reviews
Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 2 xiv Notebook Review
Not quite a Yoga. Lenovo's Yoga devices offer iv modes, the Lenovo Flex 2 14 just 2. So it is the right choice for anybody who is looking for a flexible notebook, but not a tablet. Our review shows why at that place is an update non even i year subsequently the IdeaPad Flex 14, where the differences are to the Yoga 2 13 and who could be interested in the Flex 2 14.
For the original High german review, see hither.
Concluding Nov we reviewed the Lenovo IdeaPad Flex fourteen, and it was a decent device for consumers, merely the low resolution was a drawback. Lenovo reacted, removed the IdeaPad from the designation and equipped the successor Flex 2 14 with a Full Hard disk brandish. Is the new device a whole new generation or just a remake with some improved details? What are the changes and where are the differences to the more flexible Yoga 2 13? Our review will give the answers.
Suitable comparing devices are the Toshiba Satellite W30t as well as the Asus Transformer Book TF300LA. The Acer Aspire R7-571G is a bit bigger and more expensive. You can also attempt the Asus VivoBook S451LB if y'all don't need a foldable screen.
The Flex 2 xiv is not yet listed on Lenovo'due south German website, but the American website advertises a wide range of colors for the convertible. However, the pictures merely show models in black or silver-gray with a black comprehend. There is no sign of the orange color version that was still bachelor for the predecessor.
Our review sample is the completely black version. The main divergence to the Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 14 is the side view, more precisely the location of the ports and the standby button. Shutting down the laptop is a tricky issue with Windows viii anyway; Lenovo was heavily criticized for the unusual location of the standby button on the IdeaPad Yoga. The Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 14 had a more than sophisticated layout with the power push at the right rear, where yous would expect information technology at a 2d look. Now it is further at the front where you wouldn't await it, merely it is pretty easy to find subsequently a piffling while.
Plastic is the fabric of choice, you don't become whatsoever metal in the example for 599 Euros (~$803) . At least the palm residuum looks similar metal with a brushed cease. Overall, the surfaces feel expert and sophisticated, just the quality impression is affected by a metallic sound when you lot press downwardly the case or the keyboard with average strength. Pressure on the display, or slight twisting, likewise results in picture distortions. However, you can just twist the lid; the base unit is very sturdy.
The main differentiator of the Lenovo Flex-series and the reason why we classify it as a convertible is the hinge, which can exist opened by effectually 300 degrees. This means you can apply the convertible in a Stand-style, which is already familiar from the Lenovo Yoga: Just fold the display back and place the device on the keyboard. The Tent-mode from the Yoga is besides possible in theory, even though Lenovo doesn't advertise it: The Flex 2 14 is placed on the edges, the keyboard is folded back and supports the touchscreen, which tin can be operated very comfortably. The main reason for this is the higher resistance and that the brandish, reverse to the laptop mode, cannot be pushed back. This fashion is certainly a useful extension for touchscreen fans.
All in all, the case just slightly changed compared to the IdeaPad Flex 14 and leaves a mixed quality impression: While nosotros like the surfaces despite the plastic, we are not convinced by the stability, specially of the display.
The ports take been completely rearranged, just the number and variety of ports did non really alter compared to the IdeaPad Flex 14: There is nonetheless just i USB 3.0 port, two USB ii.0 ports are on the right side. The simply new feature is the possibility to use a notebook lock. All the same, Lenovo waived the volume rocker on the correct side completely. Information technology is still great that we get an Ethernet port, which even supports Gigabit networks.
A 720p webcam is integrated above the display. The quality is sufficient for video calls, simply recorded videos evidence issues with the color reproduction and low-calorie-free performance, which means you lot cannot really use it for other purposes.
Communication
Lenovo is non very generous in regard to the WLAN and integrates a module which supports wireless networks with the standard up to 802.11 northward. Fast wireless networks with the latest 802.11 ac standard are not supported, just the northward-standard is usually sufficient for private use right at present.
The signal quality is okay, Windows indicates iii/five up to 4/5 bars with a distance of 10 meters from the router and through three walls (individual set up-up of the author). Webpages also load pretty quickly. Another 2 meters and some other wall result in 1/5 or 2/five bars, not the best results we always measured. It takes perceptibly longer before webpages are loaded with this distance from the router.
Maintenance
Y'all tin can find a service manual on the Cyberspace that describes the maintenance of the Lenovo Flex ii 14. It is actually not that easy to admission the components because you have to remove the keyboard first. You also have to remove the connector of the keyboard, which is not really recommended for inexperienced users. Afterwards that yous have to loosen several screws before you can lift the bottom cover and then remove the battery, which is once again non that like shooting fish in a barrel. The maintenance of the Lenovo Flex 2 fourteen is therefore for more experienced users or real professionals. You lot should not try it if you lot have never disassembled a notebook before.
Warranty
Lenovo simply grants a warranty of 12 months for the devices of the Flex-series. You will have to pay more if yous want to extend the service, at least 22.61 Euros (~$thirty) for a ii-twelvemonth standard warranty. The three-year warranty with accidental protection is the maximum option and costs 103.53 Euros (~$138).
Keyboard
The AccuType keyboard looks completely similar to the keyboard of the IdeaPad Flex, the Yoga 2 13 or the Yoga ii Pro. It is also very shut to these models in terms of typing experience: The stroke is pretty soft and at that place is inappreciably any resistance. The travel is pretty limited and the overall feedback a bit weak. However, based on our experience, y'all can work with the keyboard very well, especially since the nicely designed keys are pretty loftier and wide with xiv millimeters. The layout is intuitive and the special functions on the keys F1 to F12 are numerous and useful.
The keyboard illumination can be activated with the primal combination Fn + Spacebar, and the brightness tin can be adjusted in 2 steps. Nonetheless, the keys are also pretty piece of cake to see in the twilight cheers to the black surface with white lettering.
Touchpad
The touchpad is a ClickPad, which means that there are no dedicated mouse buttons, but the whole bottom office of the ClickPad can exist pressed to execute a left or right click, respectively. The button areas are a part of the touch-sensitive surface, and so ClickPads are cheaper for the manufacturers because they don't have to integrate defended buttons. All the same, this likewise results in a less precise treatment that we have described several times: Clicking the pad as well leads to an boosted contact, which can influence the movement of the cursor. Some ClickPads too don't have a articulate separation for left or right clicks, respectively. A center mouse push button or a scroll function, which is offered by some loftier-quality touchpads, is not available either.
The ClickPad of the Lenovo Flex 2 14 shows some of these drawbacks as well: Drag-&-Drop unremarkably works pretty well, but the cursor sometimes doesn't know which finger on the touchpad it should follow. The two clicking areas are only separated by a stripe, only you cannot feel any separation with your fingers. And then at that place can be some wrong inputs from fourth dimension to time. The travel during clicking is likewise pretty express and the feedback could be improved. At least multi-touch gestures like scrolling on websites work reliably. The surface likewise offers decent gliding capabilities and the size of the ClickPad is proficient as well with a bore of 12.5 centimeters.
Touchscreen
The touchscreen surface also convinces us with good gliding capabilities and the ability to recognize inputs from upward to x fingers simultaneously. Multi-touch gestures like zooming or scrolling are patently supported as well and piece of work pretty well. The house hinges also allow the use of the touchscreen in laptop fashion, just that does mean the Tent-mode is a fleck superfluous: Why should you plow the convertible effectually if it too works this mode?
The touchscreen itself is also sensitive and verbal in the peripheral areas. We could not make up one's mind any delays with inputs, the then-called touchscreen lag, either.
A big difference to the IdeaPad Flex 14 is the much higher display resolution of 1920x1080 pixels, which tin fifty-fifty continue upwards with much more than expensive rivals like the Acer Aspire R7-571G or the Asus Transformer Book T300LA. The Acer Aspire R7-571G clearly has an advantage in terms of brightness with 286.seven cd/chiliad²; our review sample only manages 215.3 cd/m². However, the other comparison devices and the predecessor are roughly on the aforementioned level compared to our review unit. The brightness distribution is pretty even with 88%, and you cannot see whatsoever brightness differences with the man eye, even with large colored areas.
| 229 cd/1000² | 209 cd/m² | 218 cd/k² | ||
| 227 cd/m² | 216 cd/m² | 225 cd/m² | ||
| 202 cd/m² | 211 cd/1000² | 201 cd/m² | ||
Distribution of brightness
LGD0446
X-Rite i1Pro two
Maximum: 229 cd/yard² (Nits) Average: 215.3 cd/m²
Effulgence Distribution: 88 %
Center on Battery: 216 cd/grand²
Contrast: 1029:i (Black: 0.21 cd/m²)
ΔE Colour 4.56 | 0.59-29.43 Ø5.4
ΔE Greyscale 3.51 | 0.64-98 Ø5.6
37% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 1.6.3 3D)
40.12% AdobeRGB 1998 (Argyll 2.two.0 3D)
58.two% sRGB (Argyll 2.2.0 3D)
38.81% Display P3 (Argyll two.2.0 3D)
Gamma: 2.53
Lenovo once once more uses an IPS brandish with a Pentile-RGBW matrix. A white sub-pixel is added to the red, greenish and blue pixels, which usually create the picture, but the number of sub-pixels is nonetheless lower compared to usual RGB screens. An integrated engine recalculates the pictures to ensure a good film quality and accurate colors.
Because of the lower density of sub-pixels and the recalculation of the pictures that are produced by the GPU, the sharpness can be reduced, which is clearly visible in some applications. Pentile displays take the advantage of cheaper manufacturing, and they also swallow slightly less energy, considering the background illumination tin can be dimmed for many colors thanks to the white sub-pixel.
The reduced sharpness was clearly visible in some applications in the case of the Yoga 2 13, which uses a pentile display also. Unfortunately, the same unwanted effects of the engineering as well impact our review sample in some scenarios. The colors of the display are too a chip too stake and too cool, which indicates too much blue in the colors.
The blackness value of 0.21 cd/m², even so, is fortunately pretty low, which results in a very decent contrast ratio of 1029:ane. Neither the predecessor nor the bulk of rivals tin proceed upwardly with these results.
We performed a more detailed analysis with our measurement devices and CalMAN software. We can meet a surprisingly minor departure from the platonic value of the reference color infinite sRGB, and even the blue cast is not every bit strong as feared. In this case it is true that IPS displays offering more than accurate colors than cheap TN LED displays. Overall, the blue colors take the largest deviation, and the saturation is increased. Our impression that the colors are too pale compared to the platonic value is confirmed likewise. The display is not suited for professional users with coverage of simply 53% RGB and 37% AdobeRGB.
All in all, the brandish offers a decent native resolution this time. The issue with the reduced sharpness of the pentile display, however, is not very convenient and could scare off some potential buyers. The overall colour representation is not accurate enough and as well pale, but adequate for a consumer device.
Outdoors you go problems with the very glossy surface of the touchscreen and the low average brightness of the panel. Working in vivid environments is an result, considering at that place will exist reflections almost all the time, and so it is pretty tiring for the eyes to focus on the brandish content. In that location are besides issues with reflections in brilliant indoor environments or in the shade.
The viewing-angle stability of IPS displays is unremarkably very expert, but yous can see a pretty astringent brightness decrease that results in a much darker film when yous turn the Lenovo Flex 2 14 to the left or right by more 30 degrees. However, vertical changes are no problem; the brightness remains stable even with very flat viewing angles.
How much performance does the Lenovo Flex 2 xiv offer? An interesting question since yous get an SSD and a dedicated GPU for the comparatively low price. The amount of memory has been reduced to 4096 MB compared to the predecessor and the processor is only an Intel Core i3-4010U, which does not offer all the features of the Core i5 within the IdeaPad Flex xiv. We still expect a decent role performance and we can maybe fifty-fifty play some games with the dedicated GPU.
Organization information Lenovo Flex 2 14
The IdeaPad Flex xiv used an Intel Core i5-4200U clocked at 1.vi GHz, the Flex 2 14 is equipped with a Cadre i3-4010U running at 1.7 GHz (probably to keep the price down, despite the dedicated GPU). The main difference is not the clock, but the supported features, where the Cadre i5 has an advantage over the Core i3. Both processors support Hyper-Threading, which ways the two cores tin can execute upwardly to four tasks simultaneously. All the same, the Cadre i3-4010U has no Turbo Boost: While the Intel Core i5-4200U runs with up to 2.6 GHz, the Core i3-4010U stays at upwardly to i.7 GHz all the time.
This results in a performance disadvantage of up to 35%, or even about fifty% if you lot use one core, in the synthetic benchmarks of the Cinebench-series. This is perceptible in exercise when you navigate the OS, only with more than enervating calculations in item, for instance, picture or video editing. That the lower performance is not such an evident trouble is a result of the SSD.
Cinebench R11.v CPU Single 64Bit
0.76 Points
Cinebench R11.5 CPU Multi 64Bit
one.85 Points
Cinebench R11.5 OpenGL 64Bit
29.96 fps
Cinebench R15 CPU Single 64Bit
67 Points
Cinebench R15 CPU Multi 64Bit
171 Points
Cinebench R15 OpenGL 64Bit
50.2 fps
Cinebench R15 Ref. Match 64Bit
99.vi %
Assistance
The comparison of the system performance with the PCMark-series shows that the defended graphics menu in particular is the big deviation to the other systems: PCMark 8 shows a very big departure in the Creative test because it benefits from more than GPU performance. Other devices similar the Toshiba Satellite W30t fall behind considering of their conventional difficult drives.
This ways y'all can look more performance from the Lenovo Flex two xiv compared to the rivals when you use GPU-enervating applications. Another operation advantage is the SSD, even though you can but use a capacity of effectually 100 GB in render. The tedious processor prevents even better results.
| PCMark 7 Score | 3816 points | |
| PCMark 8 Home Score Accelerated v2 | 2274 points | |
| PCMark 8 Creative Score Accelerated v2 | 2536 points | |
| PCMark 8 Piece of work Score Accelerated v2 | 2877 points | |
| Help | ||
The comparison with the Lenovo Yoga 2 xiii quickly shows that a conventional hard bulldoze cannot keep upwards with the SSD inside the Lenovo Flex two 14 in terms of transfer rates and access times. Nosotros already mentioned that you lot accept to live with significantly less capacity in return. The larger amount of system retention and the faster processor of the IdeaPad Flex 14 enable slightly amend results and the SSD inside the Asus Transformer Book T300LA is significantly faster.
Sequential Read: 485.3MB/due south
Sequential Write: 126.4MB/s
Access Time Write: 0.06ms
The most interesting topic in the Operation section is certainly the dedicated graphics card: The Lenovo Flex 2 14 is equipped with an Nvidia GeForce 840M that has 2048 MB dedicated memory and a core clock of ane,028 MHz. The 3DMarks show that the mainstream GPU is between 20% and sixty% faster than the integrated Intel HD Graphics 4400 and Radeon HD 8210 in the Lenovo IdeaPad Flex 14D, respectively.
The Flex ii 14 can also utilize the Intel HD Graphics 4400, for instance, for simple tasks because information technology consumes less power. The notebook supports the automatic GPU switching via Nvidia Optimus technology.
Only the Acer Aspire R7-571G and the Asus VivoBook S451LB also use a dedicated GPU within the comparison. Acer's device is clearly ahead with its GeForce GT 750M. The Asus VivoBook S451LB uses a GeForce GT 740M from the last generation, which is a bit slower than the GeForce 840M.
All in all, the Lenovo Flex ii xiv offers quite a lot of GPU performance within the comparison, which expands the usage scenarios. But is decent gaming possible? We volition check that in the next section.
| 3DMark 11 Performance | 2260 points | |
| 3DMark Ice Tempest Standard Score | 41150 points | |
| 3DMark Cloud Gate Standard Score | 4600 points | |
| 3DMark Fire Strike Score | 1286 points | |
| Help | ||
Y'all tin play games with the Lenovo Flex 2 xiv and the quality is not even bad in some cases: Older or less demanding electric current titles run smoothly with medium settings. All the same, you cannot use the native display resolution most of the time.
This results in a trouble: Some games show strange behavior. Thief, for instance, only lets you change the resolution when you leave the game; this was not the case for any of our other review units. Tomb Raider does not scale lower resolutions to the total display size. The same applies for Anno 2070, even though the full-screen option is activated. But the mouse overlay does, and so at that place are issues when you play the game. We suspect that this is a result of the new calculation of the picture from the GPU by the display controller.
Nosotros could launch Diablo III and too heard the audio, just the display just did non desire to bear witness a movie. The game ran later on nosotros switched to the Intel Hard disk Graphics 4400, but the performance was evidently worse. There are as well picture errors: Shifted lines appear that expect as if they would exist from a larger-scaled picture. Nonetheless, this last outcome could exist solved with an update to Nvidia'southward latest reference driver.
The GeForce 840M is at the bottom in terms of performance: The bulk of comparison devices with the same GPU usually manage a couple of frames more than. This is most likely a event of the pretty slow processor, which restricts the performance of the mainstream GPU.
System Noise
The Flex two 14 is, fortunately, pretty restrained in terms of system noise: The fan is often completely deactivated during idle. It simply starts running if the applications go more demanding. The result is a slight murmur, but a maximum dissonance of xxx.4 dB(A) during idle is hardly audible.
The notebook reaches up to 36.four dB(A) if y'all play games or use very complex applications, but this is however pretty quiet. The successor IdeaPad Flex fourteen, the Lenovo Yoga 2 13 or the Acer Aspire R7-571G are louder, whereas the Toshiba Satellite W30t or the Asus Transformer Book T300LA are quieter with hardly audible fans.
Noise Level
| Idle | 29.two / 29.8 / 30.four dB(A) | |
| Load | 33.2 / 36.4 dB(A) | |
 | ||
| 30 dB 40 dB(A) fifty dB(A) | ||
| min: | ||
, med: 
, max: 
All the devices within the comparison were pretty quiet during operation, only there were also two models with the Lenovo Yoga two 13 or the Acer Aspire R7-571G that were pretty warm under maximum load for the graphics card and the processor: The Aspire reached a maximum temperature of 51.7 °C at the lesser, and so using it on your lap is not a very convenient experience.
The Lenovo Flex two fourteen can be pretty hot every bit well if you stress information technology for a longer catamenia: We measured up to 47.ix °C, which is not a convenient surface temperature. But like to all other devices: The maximum load for the processor and the graphics bill of fare is a major exception. You can inappreciably experience whatsoever warming in exercise and it is groovy during gaming, either. We measured up to 31.iv °C during idle.
We faux continuous maximum load for the GPU and the CPU with our stress test to see how the temperatures and the clocks develop over time. Fortunately, the temperatures of the two cadre components are never critical: We measured 70 °C for the GeForce 840M and up to 76 °C at the processor.
The clocks under maximum load are slightly decreased for both components: The GeForce 840M cannot reach its maximum Turbo clock of one,124 MHz, just the clock of 1,092 MHz is just slightly below that. The CPU clock drops from 1.7 GHz to one.4-1.v GHz. Since the simultaneous maximum load for the two components represents a theoretical test and the differences to the maximum clock are very small, you lot can expect the total performance from the Flex two 14 under load.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maximum: 42 °C = 108 F Boilerplate: 37 °C = 99 F | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maximum: 47.nine °C = 118 F Average: 38.half-dozen °C = 101 F | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ability Supply (max.) 50.7 °C = 123 F | Room Temperature 24 °C = 75 F | Voltcraft IR-900
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maximum: 29.5 °C = 85 F Average: 28.3 °C = 83 F | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Maximum: 31.4 °C = 89 F Average: 28.7 °C = 84 F | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Power Supply (max.) thirty.i °C = 86 F | Room Temperature 24 °C = 75 F | Voltcraft IR-900
(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 37 °C / 99 F, compared to the average of thirty.2 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Convertible.
(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42 °C / 108 F, compared to the boilerplate of 35.3 °C / 96 F, ranging from 21 to 55.seven °C for the form Convertible.
(-) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 47.9 °C / 118 F, compared to the average of 36.6 °C / 98 F
(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.3 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of thirty.ii °C / 86 F.
(+) The palmrests and touchpad are reaching skin temperature equally a maximum (35.nine °C / 96.half-dozen F) and are therefore not hot.
(-) The average temperature of the palmrest surface area of like devices was 28.4 °C / 83.1 F (-vii.five °C / -13.5 F).
The speakers of the Flex ii 14 are underneath the front edge of the notebook. You can select different profiles for the sound with the Dolby Digital Plus software or use an blaster to accommodate the audio to your ain preferences.
All in all, the speakers are not likewise bad and actually sound a bit amend compared to the IdeaPad Flex xiv: The maximum volume is yet pretty high, but in that location are no distortions. The speakers have a difficult time creating a actually differentiated sound with very rich pieces (singer, orchestra and choir), simply yous can still hear the individual instruments and the voices, which is not a matter of grade for every notebook. The high tones are as well rich and there is hardly whatever bass, just the overall sound is pretty balanced.
Music and pic enthusiasts are certainly going to employ external speakers for the long term, just the fact that there is only 1 stereo jack could be an upshot, because y'all cannot attach a microphone beside the speakers. This also ways y'all cannot use loftier-quality headphones with one connector each for the headphones and the microphone.
The integrated microphone actually consists of two microphones, a and so called dual-assortment microphone. This can assistance to divide background noise from voices, and the voice was actually very clear and the ambient noise pretty repose in a brusque test call via Skype.
Ability Consumption
Our review sample leaves a mixed impression in regard to ability consumption: The 0.1 Watts when the device is turned off could be improved; nearly of the comparison devices actually don't eat any power. The stand up-by consumption is too comparatively high with 0.three Watts. The idle consumption is at the lower bottom of the comparison with seven.7 Watts on average, merely the maximum idle value is a chip higher with 12.9 Watts. The average consumption nether load is pretty boilerplate with 33 Watts because of the defended graphics card, just like the maximum consumption of 46.three Watts.
All in all, the consumption of the Lenovo Flex two 14 is decent. The device does not break any new records in terms of ability consumption, but it does non waste whatever power either when you consider the performance.
All the same, there is one unrivaled winner in terms of saving power: The Asus Transformer Volume T300LA uses a surprisingly small amount of energy in every scenario, but information technology does not have a defended graphics card.
Compared to the IdeaPad Flex fourteen, the battery of the Flex 2 fourteen is much smaller: Lenovo reduced the capacity from 48 Wh to 32.v Wh. This can exist a problem since the IdeaPad Flex xiv was already equipped with a processor from the Haswell generation and did non have a defended GPU. Unfortunately, there are no records of the IdeaPad Flex 14'due south consumption in our database, then nosotros cannot brand a direct comparison.
All the same, the bombardment runtimes compared to the IdeaPad Flex xiv are on the aforementioned, pretty mediocre level if you don't use the dedicated graphics card: The Asus Transformer Book T300LA or the Toshiba Satellite W30t tin can sometimes fifty-fifty double the battery runtimes, but they e'er manage longer runtimes away from a socket.
If you lot just write text or browse the web, the Lenovo Flex two 14 does not manage a whole business day with 5:42 hours. The runtime when you sentinel a video is more than practical with 5:02 hours, merely information technology is still significantly shorter than the most 10 hours of the Asus Transformer Book T300LA.
The runtimes that Lenovo squeezes out of the admittedly small battery are practical, but other devices are significantly better however.
Battery Runtime
| Idle (without WLAN, min brightness) | 7h 45min | |
| WiFi Surfing | 5h 42min | |
| Big Buck Bunny H.264 1080p | 5h 02min | |
| Gaming | 1h 13min | |
| Load (maximum brightness) | 1h 03min |
Non as flexible equally the Lenovo Yoga 2 13, just yous salve 100 Euros (~$134) in return. You tin save the money if you don't need the Tablet-mode of the Yoga, otherwise, the two convertibles are very like – the Lenovo Flex 2 fourteen has a 0.7-inch larger display and the device is half-a-kilogram heavier.
However, the Flex 2 xiv is not really a successor of the IdeaPad Flex 14 since the differences are just marginal – non fifty-fifty the processor generation has changed. The case has grown a lilliputian in every dimension and the weight was slightly increased. The display is finally Total Hard disk drive, but it cannot really be used outdoors and the viewing angles are not perfect, either.
The battery is now noticeably smaller, but at least it does not really affect the battery runtimes. Nevertheless, they were not really competitive for an ultra-mobile device in the case of the IdeaPad Flex fourteen in the first place. A much more important advantage is the dedicated graphics card. The GeForce 840M is normally powerful enough for older or some electric current titles with medium settings, which might be sufficient for less ambitious gamers.
Overall, the Flex 2 14 is a solid budget convertible, merely you tin can really notice the comparatively low price: Many details are not very sophisticated, for example, the position of the stand-by push button or that there is but one USB 3.0 port. The low stability of the brandish and the metallic sound when you twist the base unit leave a cheap impression.
If you lot tin can live with these drawbacks for this price, you become a well-equipped convertible for standard tasks that is equipped with a fast SSD, Gigabit-LAN and skillful input devices. Considering of the scaling problems that touch on many applications, we deducted one point from the final rating.
I initially wrote about gaming laptops when I joined Notebookcheck in 2009. I was and then involved with the setup of the comparison portal Notebookinfo and worked with social media concepts for large companies similar BMW and Adidas, while also returning to work for Notebookcheck in 2012. Nowadays, I focus on smartphones, tablets, and future technologies. Since 2018 I have been Managing Editor for mobile device reviews, working alongside my colleague Daniel Schmidt.
I grew up with mod consumer electronics and my first computer was a Commodore C64, which encouraged my interest in building my ain systems. I started working equally a review editor for Notebookcheck during my dual studies at Siemens. Currently, I am mainly responsible for dealing with business organization laptops and mobile workstations. It's a dandy experience to exist able to review the latest devices and technologies and then compare them with each other.
Specifications
Graphics adapter
NVIDIA GeForce 840M - 2048 MB, Core: 1029 MHz, Retentiveness: 900 MHz, nvlddmkm ix.18.xiii.3269 (ForceWare 332.69), + Intel HD Graphics 4400
Retentiveness
4096 MB
, PC3-12800 DDR3L SDRAM 1600 MHz
Display
xiv.00 inch sixteen:9, 1920 x 1080 pixel, capacitive touchscreen, LGD0446, IPS, Pentile RGBW, glossy: yes
Mainboard
Intel Lynx Bespeak-LP
Storage
Samsung SSD PM851 128 GB MZ7TE128HMGR, 128 GB
, 102 GB free
Soundcard
Intel Lynx Betoken-LP - High Definition Sound Controller
Connections
two USB ii.0, i USB 3.0 / three.1 Gen1, 1 HDMI, 1 Kensington Lock, Audio Connections: combined stereo jack, Card Reader: SD card reader
Networking
Realtek RTL8168/8111 Gigabit-LAN (ten/100/yard/2500/5000MBit/s), Realtek RTL8723BE Wireless LAN 802.11n PCI-Due east NIC (b/g/n = Wi-Fi iv), Bluetooth 4.0
Size
height x width x depth (in mm): 22.4 x 343 x 255 ( = 0.88 x 13.5 x 10.04 in)
Operating System
Microsoft Windows eight.1 64 Bit
Camera
Webcam: 0.9 MP webcam
Additional features
Speakers: Stereo speakers on the back, Keyboard: "Accu-Blazon" chiclet keyboard, Keyboard Light: yeah, 24 Months Warranty
Weight
ane.938 kg ( = 68.36 oz / iv.27 pounds), Ability Supply: 236 g ( = viii.32 oz / 0.52 pounds)
Devices from a unlike Manufacturer and/or with a different CPU
Devices with the same GPU
Devices with Same Screen Size and/or Weight
- Tips for buying a notebook - notebookCHECK Purchase Advisory
- Find the right notebook - notebookCHECK Hardware Guide
- Brandish resolution comparing - DPI (grain size) of displays
- Our examination criteria
- Manufacturer's data
Pros | |
| + | Flexible hinge |
| + | Elementary blueprint |
| + | Decent input devices |
| + | Fast SSD |
| + | Defended GPU |
| + | Gigabit LAN |
| + | Decent speakers |
| + | Quiet operation |
| + | Limited gaming capabilities |
| + | Total Hd brandish |
| + | Good performance in practice |
Cons | |
| - | Display sometimes blurry |
| - | Scaling issues |
| - | Very glossy panel |
| - | Small bombardment |
| - | Limited storage chapters |
| - | Warm nether maximum load |
| - | Only one USB 3.0 port |
| - | Picture distortions with pressure on the panel |
Lenovo Flex ii 14 - 2014-07-29 07/29/2014 v4(old)
Florian Wimmer
Convertible - Weighted Average
Florian Wimmer, 2014-08- 7 (Update: 2018-05-15)
stockmanfrict1948.blogspot.com
Source: https://www.notebookcheck.net/Lenovo-IdeaPad-Flex-2-14-Notebook-Review.122901.0.html
0 Response to "Lenovo Flex 14 Inch 2 in 1 10th Gen Reviews"
Post a Comment